• To: 'Jason Diamond' <jason@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Push and Pull?
• From: "Sterin, Ilya" <Isterin@c...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:42:17 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <013b01c1a5f7$1012feb0$4a265fa6@ck3162154a>

I'm not familiar with XmlReader, but just a quick question, before I
look at the docs.  What is the benefit of stream-based without event
handling?

Ilya

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Diamond [mailto:jason@i...] 
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Push and Pull?
> 
> 
> > I'd describe the main difference as "event-driven" vs. 
> "tree-based".  
> > Event-driven processing models can have a "push" interface 
> (like SAX, 
> > where the parser calls the
> > application) or a "pull" interface (where the application calls the 
> > parser).
> 
> As an alternative to "event-driven", I use the term 
> "stream-based" (as opposed to "tree-based".) Both SAX and 
> .NET's XmlReader are "stream-based" but only SAX is "event-driven".
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Push and Pull?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>

• References:
  • Re: Push and Pull?
    • From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Push and Pull?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: [Sax-devel] RFE [ #496133 ] New resolver entry point
• Previous by thread: Re: Push and Pull?
• Next by thread: Re: Push and Pull?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread