• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: No to RELAX-NG (for now)
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:29:49 -0800 (PST)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306D7F54C@HQ5>

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> And when necessary, I'll buy that, Murali!
>
> Necessity:  real but often a local requirement.  The
> dilemma of standards is that they aren't supposed to
> be global solutions to local problems.

I believe that the equilibrium point for the current set of schema
languages, which are grammar-based, is RELAX-NG, or a regular tree grammar
based proposal.

Also I think only time can say whether the above conjecture is right or
not.

Also, I think I might say that the developers of RELAX-NG before they came
up with RELAX-NG, have studied XML Schema proposals quite well, as well as
the requirements. The reason I say this is I am not sure if they are
actually local problems.. Anyways, personally I will always be interested
in a third party's point of view most importantly.. (and also the point of
views of XML Schemas' developers).

cheers and regards - murali.

• References:
  • RE: No to RELAX-NG (for now)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The use of XML syntax in XML Query
• Next by Date: Re: The use of XML syntax in XML Query
• Previous by thread: RE: No to RELAX-NG (for now)
• Next by thread: newbie question building a wml browser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread