• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:41:53 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <3C58F0CA.C6D43D92@r...> <3C58F0CA.C6D43D92@r...> <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJMEAIHCAA.ldodds@i...> <200201301936.g0UJaOj12628@d...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020131165520.00a7ece8@p...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020131182356.01c7e720@p...>

Sean McGrath wrote:
> 
> At 10:14 31/01/2002 -0800, Paul Prescod wrote:
>...
> 
> Functionally, what do AFs do, that a simple, streaming mapping system based
> on, say XPath (or streaming XPath subset), couldn't do?
> 
> If the answer is "not much" then perhaps their is scope for providing the
> functionality
> of AFs without the DTD-welded, instance affecting notation currently extant?

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200201/msg01629.html

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: RE: Advice on parsing approach/tools?
• Previous by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread