Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 07:58 pm, Jonathan Borden wrote: > No seriously, the reason it doesn't matter is because XML Namespaces > are a done deal. All this discussion would have been fine when the > rec was under development, and I understand there _was_ alot of > discussion. But now, circa 2002, there are literally millions of > copies of deployed software that require XML namespace conformance, > as well as many W3C recommendations that require XML Namespaces > conformance. In the "let a thousand flowers bloom" theory of the > internet, XML Namespaces has bloomed, and bloomed big. I'm not sure that namespaces *have* won the day.... As you say though, time will tell.... for now, I can ignore them, and write software that uses just the QName, or AF's or <whatever> ;-)
|
