• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:13:39 +0000
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020130063440.029e5c60@p...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020130090533.01d83dc8@p...><E16VeQs-0006nP-00@s...><3C56F1C3.50504@r...><DC3ZNKPNNI4YPN8RQ73URHBSKE775.3c56e3aa@MChamp><3C56F1C3.50504@r...>

At 06:35 30/01/2002 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 09:09 AM 30/01/02 +0000, Sean McGrath wrote:
> >And its positively *scary* the number of apps out there in the real world
> >that have wired the processing to the prefix - not the fully qualified
> >name.
>
>Ouch, really?!?  This calls for some serious jumping up and down
>and shrieking.  Name some names, Sean. -Tim

No can do on xml-dev. Consulting clients, privacy etc.

Sean

• Follow-Ups:
  • misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, butit's not in the data alone)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Auto-completion in editors
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Auto-completion in editors
• Previous by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, butit's not in the data alone)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread