• To: Don Box <dbox@m...>
• Subject: Re: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:51:03 -0800
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <CFC4F26947496E4092489B242561495804277176@s...>

Don Box wrote:
> 
> FWIW, this was the original intent of the SOAPAction header from earlier
> versions of SOAP.
> 
> Along those lines, I think I would rather know the local name and
> namespace name of the root element than every stinking namespace
> declaration that is in use. More often than not, the root element
> implies the remainder of the document.

More often than not is not sufficient...but let's not go there! We've
been arguing about this in different fora recently already.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
    • From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Compound processing
• Next by Date: Re: Strategies for a lowly XML document
• Previous by thread: RE: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
• Next by thread: RE: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread