[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
• From: Brian Smith <blsmith@b...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 20:41:38 -0600
• References: <D7155AD41ECFD511AF4A00B0D0202CB51DFC0D@MAILHOST>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20011227

Actually, I've been wondering why W3C XML Schema doesn't use processing 
instructions instead of the xsi:schemaLocation attribute. Multiple PI's 
seem to be better than a space-seperated list of URI's. Can somebody 
point me to the rationale?

Thanks,
Brian

Michael Brennan wrote:

> While tinkering with XLink and RDDL, I had an idea that I thought I'd toss
> out on this list. I'd be interested to know if there have been similar
> proposals in the past.
> 
> A number of specs put forward specialized mechanisms for associating
> external resources with a document for a specific purpose. For example, XML
> Schema gives us the "xsi:schemaLocation" attribute, XML Catalog gives us the
> "oasis-xml-catalog" PI, and for associating stylesheets, we have the
> "xml-stylesheet" PI. It seems like these could be unified into one
> generalized mechanism by building upon XLink and RDDL constructs. You
> couldn't use XLink syntax directly since these examples all must be declared
> before the document element or on the document element itself. But it seems
> to me that one could designate a generalized PI that mimics XLink simple
> links that could achieve the desired result.
> 
> For example, the attribute "xsi:schemaLocation='http://foo/bar foobar.xsd
> http://yadda/yadda yadda.xsd'" could become:
> 
>   <?xml-link role="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> arcrole="http://foo/bar" href="foobar.xsd"?>
>   <?xml-link role="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> arcrole="http://yadda/yadda" href="yadda.xsd"?>
> 
> The PI <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="style.css"?> could become:
> 
>   <?xml-link
> role="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/css"
>           href="style.css"?>
> 
> The PI <?oasis-xml-catalog catalog="http://example.com/catalog.xml"?> could
> become:
> 
>   <?xml-link role="urn:oasis:names:tc:entity:xmlns:xml:catalog" 
>              href="http://example.com/catalog.xml"?>
> 
> This seems to me better than the current situation for the following
> reasons:
> * Provides a consistent, extensible mechanism for these sorts of processing
> directives.
> * Leverages namespaces and URIs for identifying the intent and purpose of a
> directive.
> * Does not clutter up the document's infoset with processing directives as
> attributes do.
> 
> Is this a reasonable idea or am I off my rocker on this? Have there been
> similar such proposals?
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 

• References:
  • A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
• Next by Date: Re: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
• Previous by thread: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
• Next by thread: Re: A thought on XLink in PIs for processing directives
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread