• To: Mike.Champion@S... (Champion, Mike)
• Subject: Re: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:13:22 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E4021BD8E8@u...> from "Champion, Mike" at Dec 31, 2001 12:10:07 PM

> > I'm suggesting that doing it "beside" HTTP makes better sense 
> > than doing it "on top of".
> 
> Ahhh ... I see the point now.

That was fast!

>  Makes sense to me, but I'm not sure of the
> implications for Ruple, JXTA-spaces, IETF, Apache, etc.

One of the implications is that there's an awful lot of unnecessary
work underway, and not just in open source circles.  Though I suppose
that if a deeper understanding of HTTP & Web architecture is a result,
then it won't have been in vain.

>  How would the
> "spaces" people move in that direction, or get the world to move in that
> direction?

Tell them to move it themselves, like the rest of us. 8-)

> I think I need to look into HTTP extensibility more deeply.

For sure, but if you haven't already, I'd suggest spending some time
looking into the expressiveness of HTTP as-is.  Trying to extend it
without understanding that will likely yield problems.

This may help;

http://www.markbaker.ca/2001/09/draft-baker-http-resource-state-model

> Thanks for the clarification!

My pleasure.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@p...
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

• Next by Date: RE: [Ann] Project Labrador
• Next by thread: RE: [Ann] Project Labrador
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread