[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Status on IE6 and XML Conformance

• From: Chris Bayes <chris@b...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:33:24 +0100

> Sounds like a sensible approach.  The only thing to watch out for
> is, if the bad character is 5 screenfulls into the doc, the 
> "you've got a problem" message needs to be in the first 
> screen - which is 
> what IE normally does.

It isn't. I have been using ie and xsl PI for a long time to view
logfiles. Ie can get quite a long way into a logfile before it displays
an error. Wether it is a WF or encoding error. Anyway, I am sure that
people want to know when there is a problem. I have worked in places
where people use ie as a quick validator of their data. If it displays
in ie then it must be ok. Whatever way the error is flagged I don't care
I just think that it should be flagged in an obvious way.

My 2p worth 
Chris

XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml

• Prev by Date: RE: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Next by Date: RE: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Previous by thread: RE: Status on IE6 and XML Conformance
• Next by thread: Infoworld's CTO on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread