[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xml schema

• From: Laura Hatcher <lhatcher@a...>
• To: Ian Rogers <ian.rogers@n...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:20:35 -0400

Well there are many schema languages to chose from not just the w3c schema
language.  I think that schema languages are lot more widely used now a days,
but the best answer I can give you is to see what your needs are, and to go with
what suits your needs.  I would personally recommend using a schema.  More and
more parsers are supporting schema and it gives you more room to breathe than a
DTD.

Ian Rogers wrote:

> hi
>
> I am looking into using the w3c xml_schema instead of using a dtd, as the
> schema allows me to put a lot more constraints on my xml, but the thing that
> i am not sure about is it's stability, and how widely it is supported by
> browsers,
>
> if anyone can give any plus or minor points for the schema i would be very
> grateful, as i would really like to know if it would be worth using a schema
> over a dtd
>
> thanks
>
> Ian
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • xml schema
    • From: Ian Rogers <ian.rogers@n...>

• Prev by Date: Fw: Has XML run its course?
• Next by Date: Re: Has XML run its course?
• Previous by thread: xml schema
• Next by thread: OT (was - RE: Has XML run its course?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread