[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Namespaces Best Practice

• From: Tony.Coates@r...
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:20:45 +0100

On 21/09/2001 13:38:12 Jonathan Borden wrote:

>I suspect that if we were to
>run a "delibately obfuscated XML" contest, documents employing heavy prefix
>overloading and mixed use of qualified and unqualified -unprefixed- elements
>would carry the day.

Of course they would.  But some days you just have to do what deadlines, and/or processing limits on streaming content, allow.

     Cheers,
          Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
(1) Content Distribution Architect - Project Gazelle
(2) Leader of XML Architecture & Design - Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
Tony.Coates@r...
========



-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Namespaces Best Practice
• Next by Date: RE: Things are not what they seem - was RE: Urgently n eeda reality check on the job market for XML development
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces Best Practice - some working code!
• Next by thread: The ICE (Information and Content Exchange) Authoring Groupinvite s you .......
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread