[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support

• From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:53:54 +1000

Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:

> > I agree that HTML was, and  is, a very good idea. But here is a usecase
> > where sending semantically rich data down the wire is better.
>
> Let us see.

What about syndicated content? The responsibility for formatting falls with the
recipient and the responsibility for the data falls with the provider. Am I
missing something?


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@a...>
  • Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices ? Versioning
• Next by Date: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Previous by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Next by thread: Re: Client-side XSLT. Re: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread