|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: OPES and XSLT
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Contract law is the emerging governing force. My guess is that as has been > said in the past, one has to assert all claims prior to publication. That is a patent-law rule, and irrelevant to copyrighted material. > This > means stating explicitly what other systems can do with your copyrighted > material. Because if you don't, they cannot copy, distribute, modify, publicly display, or publicly perform the work, except according to legal provisions for fair use/fair dealing. > The real problem is enforcement which must start at the > the source to ensure any subsequent party is subject to the contract. No contract is required. Don Park wrote: > 1. who owns the copyright on transformed data? At what threshold does > butchering stops and originality starts? Transformed data is a paradigm case of a derivative work. Assuming the original is subject to copyright at all (which it may not be), the right to transform belongs to the original creator unless delegated or sold. > 2. is the legal protection at the consuming end or at producing end? I'm not sure what this means. Are you asking which *law* applies, or who is it that has the right to sue? If the latter, the producer. > 3. what about transforming or modifying common parts of copyrighted material > like HTML during transit ? Is it illegal to inject popups at routers? Possibly. IANAL. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








