|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
Yes, and therefore, not simple. Again, in a syntax editor, ALL bets are off. Neill Kipp beat me relentlessly to make me understand that surface syntax in SGML didn't tell one enough about the actual properties of the system itself. Ah the days of innocence and batch.... Cut and paste is never simple in XSDL just as it isn't in a procedural language as using MS Access for editing VBScript shows in ASP. The nasty habit of filling in missing quote marks before one is quite done introducing bugs is perturbing. :-) Is it a hole or a feature that isn't safe given some context of use? Again, I thought local elements behaved like local variable names in a function until I had to write XPaths against them. We have programmers all over the building still scratching their heads over the "in no namespace" explanation. So I am still waiting to find out which feature is the DareToDoLess candidate. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Fuchs, Matthew [mailto:matthew.fuchs@c...] Cut and paste is a interesting issue for XSDL. XSDL allows one to create not just local elements, but also anonymous complexTypes. But XSDL also allows for type substitution. However, I cannot cut-and-paste the contents of an anonymous complexType, even if it is a sub complexType of the destination. I, at least, consider this a whole.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








