RE: infinite depth to namespaces
At 11:46 AM 31/08/01 -0700, Fuchs, Matthew wrote: > While "put everything >in a namespace" was reasonable best practice before the arrival of XSDL, the >concretization of a notion of "local elements" (I hesitate to call it >"formalization") - just as the Namespaces rec concretized the notion of >"global attribute", which hadn't existed syntactically before, although >people used them - can change what best practices can be. And best >practices for local elements is unqualified. Despite having Matt has argued this position at length, consensus has not emerged. In discussing this issue in future, I will be careful to point out that there are those who, unlike me, regard unqualified local elements as a good idea. I hope that people who share Matt's viewpoint will be equally careful to point out that their views are not universal. -Tim
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format