[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.

• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:45:50 +0100

[Matthew Fuchs]

>Every time you have orthogonal ways of doing the same thing,
>you end up with a cartesian product of cases.

Yes. There are those who find great beauty in these cartesian
products and hours of endless intellectual fun munching
on the combinations - they have the TIMTOWTDI gene[1].
These people typically love human language
and literature. Many have a background in the arts. Some of then
are linguists. Many of them prefer Perl for text processing.

Then there are those with the TSBOOWTDI gene[1]. They see
beauty in simple things and get their kicks out of
coming up with ways to re-use a handful of core facilities
in new ways. Many of them prefer Python for text processing.

I have the TSBOOWTDI gene. I can think of numerous
people I know who have the TIMTOWTDI gene and
one or two Rennaisance men with both! The latter
tends to smother the former in standards work.

If I list the top ten smartest people I know, 8 are
TIMTOWTDI's.

However the top two are hybrid TIMTOWTDI / TSBOOWTDI.

East is east and west is west and never the twain shall
meet.

Sean

[1] There Is More Than One Way To Do It
http://www.perl.org/press/glossary.html

[2] There Should Be One Obvious Way To Do It
http://www.nevada.edu/~cwebster/Python/



http://www.propylon.com
Featured speaker at Geek Cruises' XML Excursion '02
http://www.geekcruises.com/home/xml_02_home.html

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
    • From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>

• Prev by Date: Template matching (was RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word)
• Next by Date: Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread