|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF
Noting only that some maps are drawn over existing terrain, others, say a landscaping map, are specific instructions for shaping the terrain. Some DTD/Schemas are written to describe content (tag sprinkling) while others are used to direct a person/machine to create content. The map/territory conundrum is not the same in both processes. Walter, your point of view seems to be heavily influenced by the role of interpretation of a receiving node. There is no true universe AFAIK. There are messages and contexts of communication, plus contracts that one might assert and others assent to over some communication context. Because markup is simply a system, and any system by definition has rules, one consents to rules or doesn't. The creeping WebXML As Universal bugs me. It seems inimical to progress. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: W. E. Perry [mailto:wperry@f...] That map is certainly not the only possible map, gloss, structure or other opinion which might be constructed upon the non-markup content of that instance, and in fact may not be the only one which could be elaborated from that particular combination of markup and other content. But unlike, perhaps, the 'real universe' or (pace Pontius Pilate) the 'truth', marked up documents do consist of two types of content, one of which, the markup, is in some sense a commentary upon, a suggested structure for, or a possible map to some portion of the rest.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








