[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:19:17 -0400

Michael Brennan wrote:
> I'll confess to being unfamiliar with ONC-RPC, but if it is only available
> on UNIX, that doesn't quite cut it.

It is the underlying serialization (XDR) and remote procedure protocol
(ONC RPC) for the widespread NFS remote file system protocol, and is
documented in RFCs 1014 (XDR) and 1057 (RPC).

> Also, if it is unable to handle
> serializing complex graphs of data in a manner that is portable across
> platforms, that also doesn't quite cut it.

COmplex graphs, no.  XDR serializes the usual primitive types, strings,
fixed- and variable-sized octet sequences, fixed- and variable-length
homogeneous arrays, structures, and discriminated unions.  So it can
pretty much encode trees, but not arbitrary dags.
-- 
Not to perambulate             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
    the corridors               || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose     || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    in the boots of ascension.  \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • RE: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBo mb)
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
• Previous by thread: RE: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb
• Next by thread: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread