Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Missing F's (used to be XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
 8/17/01 1:22:33 PM, Tim Greiner <majormit@W...> wrote: >Actually it's an old linguistics trick....the F's that most people miss are >soft F's (with a V sound). Yep. The reason the trick works is that most people don't consciously read at the level of individual letters; their conscious perception is at the level of whole words or phrases. In fact, I'd conjecture that poor readers would actually do better on the task than good readers, because the good readers are dealing with bigger chunks of text; they're working at the "forest" level while the poorer readers are working at the "tree" level, and it's easier to see the leaves (which is what the task demands) from the latter perspective. Over on comp.lang.perl.misc, I've been arguing that there's a certain class of "stupid mistakes" that are much more likely to be made by smart people than by dumb people; they involve momentary lapses of attention that cause one to miss certain details (Perl allows trailing commas on lists, and some Perl programmers assert that using them is a Good Thing because it reduces the chance of adding a new item to a list and forgetting to put a comma after the previous last item; such lists are often written one item to the line (line breaks aren't significant in anything other than quoted literals). Others were arguing that somebody who forgot to put the comma after the previous last item didn't have enough understanding of Perl syntax to be a professional Perl programmer). IMHO, the smarter someone is, the more likely he/she is to have "habitized" certain cognitive tasks, and the more susceptible they are to attention-lapse errors on those tasks. A good piece of reading is Chapter 9, "Intelligence, or problem-solving ability" of Gerald Weinberg's classic _The Psychology of Computer Programming_. Weinberg argues that a good programmer should understand enough cognitive psychology to understand what sorts of "stupid mistakes" he's likely to be susceptible to, and take deliberate defensive measures against them. What "silly errors" do people here find they're most likely to make when creating XML documents? What "silly errors" do people here find they're most likely to make when writing code to process XML documents? What measures are you taking to reduce the likelihood of making such mistakes? What aspects of the XML Recommendation and related specs do you think encourage such errors? What aspects of the specs do you think discourage such errors? What "silly errors" do you see most often in other people's work with XML? 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
