[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:41:47 -0500

Ad hominem.  


Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?


>>What "intellectual property" (a prejudicial term if ever I heard one)
>>is there in SGML except the copyright in the text of the standard?

>publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition

Well, you've got me there.  I have no idea what any of those have to
do with SGML.

Next you'll be claiming that running NSGMLS constitutes an
unauthorized public performance of SGML.

-- Richard

• Prev by Date: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
• Next by Date: RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
• Next by thread: RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread