[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.

• From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>
• To: 'Peter Piatko' <piatko@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:11:13 -0700

Are you asking me or Tim?  I started the Formal Description activity
(formerly known as MSL) and created NUNs as they are in that document
(although others had talked about creating such a naming convention).  So
yes, my thoughts are in the same general vicinity.

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Piatko [mailto:piatko@r...]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:34 PM
> To: Fuchs, Matthew; 'Tim Bray'; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>
> To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@t...>; <xml-dev@l...>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM
> Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> 
> 
> > Likewise, one can consider the creation of a complexType as likewise
> > creating a namespace (or asserting the existence of a 
> namespace) whose
> name
> > is the concatenation of the enclosing namespace and the 
> local name of the
> > complexType (exact syntax open to discussion) and all 
> elements declared
> > immediately within it are in that namespace.
> 
> After finally glancing at the XML Schema: Formal Description 
> document I
> noticed that NUN's  (as you call them) are at least the 
> beginnings of this
> idea.  Are your thoughts in the same general vicinity?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread