[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:12:25 -0500

Yep.  Sad isn't it.  Soon you will begin to look like him too.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Park [mailto:donpark@d...]

The example below can be handled easily using Atoms and Molecules design
pattern.  Looking at the example from this perspective, I see:

Atoms:

  name, address, mode, price, quantity

Molecules:

  customer, delivery, product

String Molecules:

  lines, line

Super Molecule

  purchase

What we need is a XML processing framework that supports molecules and atoms
design pattern.  What we don't need is more complications and fancy
if-but-when-must at what I consider to be lexical slum level.  *argh* I am
starting to sound like Len.

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Previous by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread