[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Standalone declaration (was Re: diable <!DOCTYPE...>)

• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: mike@s...
• Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 23:08:04 +0100 (BST)

In article <200108241718.f7OHIfW99755@s...> you write:
>One wonders how the validity constraint can be tested without looking at
>the external declarations.

It can't, of course.  However, you - the author - can check your
documents with a validating parser (which *does* look at the external
declarations) and if it passes you can be confident that someone
else's non-external-subset-reading parser will get the right answer.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Standalone declaration (was Re: diable <!DOCTYPE...>)
    • From: Mike Brown <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Previous by thread: Standalone declaration (was Re: diable <!DOCTYPE...>)
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Another update to DTD to XML Scheme tool
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread