[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF

• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:59:56 +0100

[Walter Perry]
>the question of how to make assertions in markup about the physical
>painting, rather than about some textual representation of or commentary upon
>it, is the most contentious single question in ontological mapping.

And of course, fascinating though it is to discuss, there is no right
answer as any dyadic fork between things and references to things
can be torn apart. In Jacques Derrida-speak, all markup is
"speech" with all the issues of separation from the original
communication that that involves. There is no way to fully
separate the dancer from the dance. (Yeats-speak).

Sean

• References:
  • Re: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF
    • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>
  • Re: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Next by Date: Sort in XML pages
• Previous by thread: Re: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF
• Next by thread: RE: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread