[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:04:08 -0500

Sounds again suspiciously like grove plans.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...]

Michael Brennan wrote:
> It is very typical for an XML application to want to associate certain
> metadata with XML information items to suit certain processing needs. One
> can easily envision different metadata vocabularies to suit different
> domains.

Very nicely put.

And when you look at it this way, it's pretty clear that the the PSVI is
a mixture of several different sets of metadata. For example, what
complexType an element is supposed to be is different from whether it
can be validated by (converted to) that complexType.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
• Previous by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Next by thread: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread