RE: [OT] Announcements (was RE: XMLLight - What do you think?)
In the announcment or on the web page? I prefer the announcement to be light on details except those that tell me why I should click on the link and get the details. Otherwise, I agree that the licensing should be right up front. If a site requires more personal information than I am willing to give, I pass and also scratch the cookie they planted from the harddrive. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:36 AM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: [OT] Announcements (was RE: XMLLight - What do you think?) I'd like to add two more criteria: 1. They should clearly specify the actual price or license. Specifying a "free demo version", while interesting in itself, is not an acceptable substitute for the actual price of the product. Some people don't want to pay for software. Some people don't want to use GPL'd software. Either way, the details should be specified right up front so subscribers can rule out products that aren't of interest to them. 2. Anything that is freely downloadable should not require the submission of personal information.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format