|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was RE: XML.COM: How I Learned toLov
[Simon St. Laurent] >I'm not convinced that >the trouble in SOAP justifies its benefits, and I strongly recommend >that people with the freedom to do so explore other XML messaging >alternatives. BEEP[2] is an interesting possibility. > >[1] - http://www.naggum.no/worse-is-better.html (Richard Gabriel, 1991.) >[2] - http://www.beepcore.org/ Or even plain vanilla XML request/response payloads over plain vanilla HTTP. A great combo for messaging based web apps. I get the impression that there are developers out there who - because of their backgrounds using APIs - see XML-RPC/SOAP as a natural progression and the least disruptive route to web enable their API based, monolithic systems. For new apps, XML messaging/brokering/orchestration is well worth a look even if the paradigm is new. It more snugly fits the architecture of the web and is going to get ever more popular IMO. For existing apps, messaging is still well worth a look as the whole SOAP/WSDL/UDDI thing will not be completed until it has overlapped all of CORBA and added some stuff. Very much the bleeding edge this, and developers would be well advised to ask themselves if they need to be on this bleeding edge. For those considering messaging and looking for middleware options I recommend taking a look at the Open Source XMLBlaster MOM: http://www.xmlblaster.org/. Sean
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








