[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)

• From: Brendan Macmillan <bren@m...>
• To: pault12@p... (Paul Tchistopolskii)
• Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 17:52:18 +1000 (EST)

> > Stateful objects turned out to scale terribly, so it was all a waste of
> > effort anyway.  The simpler, less powerful approach of mere method
> > invocation is actually much better.
> 
> Strange. I think that anyone,  who've  tried writing some more or less
> complex HTML/CGI based GUI application usually comes to conclusion that
> stateless protocols ( CGI ) are 'really good' only for "hello world" kind of
> applications.
Oh, they still have state, it's just not in the object - typically delegated to
a database.  So the method invocation becomes the API for the front end of
the database/logic.

You are right: CGI is a great example.  I don't think that web-services are
any different in principle, just more general.


Cheers,
Brendan
-- 
e:  bren@m...                    v:  +61 (3)  9905 1502
Email is checked daily                              Phone is rarely attended

• References:
  • Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: Microsoft releases XQuery Demo to the Web
• Next by Date: Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
• Previous by thread: Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
• Next by thread: Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread