[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML DOM

• From: Steven Noels <stevenn@o...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 23:15:58 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...]
> Sent: dinsdag 3 juli 2001 23:01
> To: 'Steven Noels'
> Cc: Xml-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: XML DOM
>
>
> Yep, I understand DOM is an interface spec.
>
> I own an MS-published book (that for reasons of potential culpability will
> remain nameless), that, on page 227, has a diagram labeled "The
> relationship
> between the W3C DOM object interfaces", with interfaces such as
> "IXMLDOMNode" and "IXMLDOMDocument" shown. These look like COM interfaces,
> so I expect it is an error to blame W3C for this.
>

Whether W3C should be blamed for DOM or not, is another discussion :-)

But IXMLDOMNode et al. is definitely MS-speak.

Regards,

</Steven>
outerthought.org

• References:
  • RE: XML DOM
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: C struct to XML schema converter
• Next by Date: XML Schema support in Xerces DOM
• Previous by thread: RE: XML DOM
• Next by thread: RE: XML DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread