|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: building an object model of a XML schema
Thanks Ron. Makes sense. What if the idea is that the XML Schema is a set of reusable types, a toolkit that is then included/imported/redefined/substituted into other application languages? I also haven't exported a schema out of UML, but it seems to me it may include classes that such a design would not use. This probably turns on what you said: if one is designing objects, design objects. OTOH, there is that intermediate step where one is not quite designing documents in the print document or online document sense, one is designing reusable data sets more like relational tables than objects (no explicit operations) and a little less like a document (no explicit assembly). Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...] "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote: > > An excellent paper, BTW. > > In it, you suggest that it is better NOT to > generate classes from XML Schemas. It is better use > a data modeling language such as UML and generate the > schema from that. Do you still support that position? Yes, although it's based on theoretical work, not real-world experience. XML Schemas are designed to model XML documents, not objects. Consequently, you get some weirdnesses when trying to map the schema data model to an object model. If your application really thinks in terms of objects, better to start with an object/generic modelling language and go the other direction. That way, the XML schema is just a serialization syntax, not a model.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








