[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML DOM

• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 19:13:16 -0400

[Jeff Lowery]

> (this is my punishment for being vague)
>
yes...

> I know DOM, use DOM implentations, and write about DOM. I know W3C DOM
core
> address both HTML and XML.
>
> But apparently there is no such thing as a W3C 'XML DOM' spec, which is
> kinda hinted at in a W3C DOM document somewhere, and I have a book that
says
> there's such a beast, but apparently it's only an MS implentation. In
other
> words, there ain't no such thing as a W3C XML DOM spec with interfaces
like
> 'IXMLDOMDocument', so I'm going to forget I ever saw it.
>
 Right, names like that are Microsoft, and "XML DOM" is used by MS, partly
to distinguish it from their "HTML DOM"

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: XML DOM
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 BOM
• Next by Date: [Question] How to do incremental parsing?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML DOM
• Next by thread: RE: XML DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread