|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Collected Works of SAX
Although, and it may seem inconsistent on my part, if it hasn't got a home, I'm in favor of it going to OASIS based on the policies they use to keep things accessible. They have some good rules about the labeling of such assets that enable them to stay public. We had to look at this for HumanML and the OASIS rules are as open as it is possible for an org to be. Ask yourself how fast SAX is changing, how and and what breadth of people should have input, what to do when people have to drop out, etc., then look for an org that fits those constraints. For example, for VRML97, ISO enabled both the ISO version and the W3DC version of the standard, thus an ISO standard and a W3CD open version. They are kept in parallel and that seems to satisfy everyone. Private may conflict with open; open does not conflict with kept in the commons. As long as one neither steals the goose from the commons, nor the commons from the goose, the public needs are generally met. Preserve options but choose according to case. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@p...] That didn't exactly get resolved the last time it came up; there was a stall around the time Oasis got mentioned, as I seem to recall. There's an issue that Len has been mentioning lately: privatizing public resources. I'm not keen on giving SAX to any consortium, myself.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








