[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@u...>,'Jonathan Borden ' <jborden@m...>, 'Peter Flynn ' <peter@s...>
• Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:32:17 -0500

Or like 

the HyperText Markup Language (HTML)?

Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@u...]

Or if a less generic term had been chosen. Why not call it "The One And Only
One XML Schema Definition Language" (TOAOOXMLSDL), while we're at it ?

It's a bit like if a programming language was named "Programming Language"
-- it's a blatant namespace pollution :). Now we have to cope with it by
specifying "W3C XML Schema schemata" or other graceful expressions...

• Prev by Date: RE: Data storage, data exchange, data manipulation
• Next by Date: Re: the need for document type name (was: Define a root in a DTD)
• Previous by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by thread: RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread