[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SAX2 ... missing features?

• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>
• To: 'David Brownell' <david-b@p...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:12:14 -0700

Thanks for the link. I probably didn't pay too much attention because I
never used DTDs too much; I held out for schemas (I wanted the data types,
and better modularization and extensibility support). Also, in most of my
work, I'm not able to use GPL software (though most other open source
licenses are fine).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@p...]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 4:51 PM
> To: Michael Brennan
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: SAX2 ... missing features?
> 
> 
> >  Of course, it would be even
> > better to see validators implemented as SAX filters, so the 
> programmer can
> > exercise more control. The only one I've seen implemented 
> this way is James
> > Clark's RELAX NG validator, though I haven't attempted an 
> exhaustive survey.
> 
> What, you mean you missed the original?
> 
> http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net/java/apidoc/gnu/xml/pipeline/Va
> lidationConsumer.html
> 
> Does standard DTD validation.
> 
> I should look at that RelaxNG validator; the previous validator (from
> that family) which I saw used XSLT.
> 
> - Dave
> 
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2 ... missing features?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Just a Little Explanaton for Veering (RE: Blueberry/Unicode/ XML)
• Next by Date: RE: Just a Little Explanaton for Veering (RE: Blueberry/Unicode/ XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2 ... missing features?
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2 ... missing features?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread