Re: Well-formed Blueberry
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I think there's a way to limit the damage this does to the existing > infrastructure. Whatever the eventual identifier is chosen for > Blueberry (version="1.1", unicode="3.1", etc.) I think it should be > a *fatal error* to use this identifier in a document that does not > actually use any of the newly introduced characters in an XML name > somewhere. The trouble with this scheme is that it makes generation on the fly, particularly by separate modules, difficult. > In other words, if a document can be an XML 1.0 document, it must be > an XML 1.0 document. I would certainly agree that it SHOULD, but MUST seems a bit severe. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format