• From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:26:04 +0100

On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Dylan Walsh wrote:

> Does this mean that it is impossible to write a XML Schema where this
> document would *not* be valid:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" ?>
> <b>
> 	<c />
> </b>

Actually that is always valid[atable] as it satisfies the
constraint that there is a root element. You need to ask the
same question of

<b><c/></b><b><c/></b>...[repeated]

This whole things smacks of Real Programmers...RP don't use
Schemas, RP code DTDs with Architectures and HyTime :-)

///Peter

• References:
  • RE: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
    • From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@K...>

• Prev by Date: XML database's
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
• Next by thread: RE: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread