[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]


  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>
  • To: 'Richard Tobin' <richard@c...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:07:58 -0700

utf 8 bom
Microsoft Notepad saves a BOM at the start of a UTF-8 file (as someone else
points out in another post).

As much as I'd like to dispense with the BOM since XML has no use for it, I
think the case of Notepad points out a valid use case for keeping it. One of
the strengths of XML is that it is just text and any text editor can be used
to compose XML. A non-XML aware text editor, though, has no reliable way of
recognizing the character encoding of a file without a BOM. None of the
filesystems I know of support extended attributes that can identify the
character encoding of a text file, and every one of them is saddled with a
non-Unicode legacy for character encoding (ASCII, ISO-8859-1, whatever). If
we preclude the presence of a BOM in an XML entity, then we undermine the
utility of such generalized text editors for composing XML.

I think that use case is a strong argument for keeping the BOM, in spite of
the complications it poses for current XML parsers that don't support it.

Unfortunately, I don't think Sun's Crimson parser supports the BOM. I
remember having problems with this with JAXP 1.0. I'll try to recreate a
test case this afternoon and pass on the results (I have to prepare for a
meeting, right now).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:24 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: UTF-8 BOM
> The W3C XML Core WG is considering the question of whether a UTF-8
> byte-order make (BOM) is allowed at the start of an XML entity.  This
> question was raised a few weeks ago in a thread on comp.text.xml
> starting at article
>   <180520011620538217%andreas.prilop@a...>
> We would like to determine how existing parsers handle the byte
> sequence #xEF #xBB #xBF when it appears at the start of an XML
> document or other entity.  Is it treated as a BOM (and not part
> of the text of the entity) or as a zero-width non-breaking space
> character?
> We have placed a number of test cases at
>   http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/bomtest/
> and would be grateful for feedback on how parsers handle them.  Please
> post results here in xml-dev to avoid unnecessary duplication.
> We would also like to know of any editors (or similar tools) that
> generate XML documents starting with a UTF-8 BOM.
> -- Richard (on behalf of the XML Core WG)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.