• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• To: Gary Stephenson <garys@i...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:48:06 -0700 (PDT)

Also I will say that i think it is quite easy to determine whether a
content model is deterministic or not -- I think the XML 1.0 spec,
Appendix E, just mentions that you can do it with "follow-sets"?? -- that
is basically it, I believe.

regards - murali.

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Gary Stephenson wrote:

> Hi Murali,
>
> > If you wanted a non-deterministic content model
>
> At the moment all I'm trying to do is train my processor to properly recognise
> non-deterministic models.  I realise that in many cases, these can be
> algorithmically transformed to deterministic equivalents - but I am not
> attempting to scale such lofty heights just yet! <g>
>
> BTW, I am also aware of your opposition to the requirement for deteminism -
> and at this point I agree with you that it seems an unwarranted constraint.
> But then, I'm just getting started with all this stuff, so my opinion ain't
> worth two hoots... (yet) <g>
>
> cheers,
>
> gary
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
>

• References:
  • Re: deterministic content model?
    • From: Gary Stephenson <garys@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Should finalDefault allow list and union?
• Next by Date: Re: xml DOM/DTD graph visualization
• Previous by thread: Re: deterministic content model?
• Next by thread: Re: deterministic content model?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread