• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:25:12 -0500

Out of band information.

Dealer chooses.


Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:15 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)


Quoting David Brownell <david-b@p...>:

> One
> hopes
> that the fix still facilitates significant amounts of work being done by
> stream
> transforms.  CPP has done #includes as stream operations for decades,
> and I'm not sure I see why doing it in XML ought to be different.

I always that that XML including would "obviously" be a processing
instruction
issue, myself.

<?xml-include uri="http://www.foo.bar.com/fiddle.xml#...xpointer or
whatever..."
?>

 - if not, then what ARE processing instructions for?

> 
> - Dave
> 

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

------------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: RE: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
• Previous by thread: RE: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
• Next by thread: Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread