• From: Rod Davison <rdavison@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:27:18 -0400

I have avoided the whole issue by just referring to "those schema thingies".

Does schemas versus schemata really matter?  After all, I hear in common use 
both phenomena and phenomenons, memorandums and memoranda -- as long as it is 
clear and unambiguous, and your usage is consistent, who cares? 


On Thursday 28 June 2001 11:07 am, Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> There are a growing number of phenomenons in the medias that are choosing
> amongst many scenarii to use the form 'schemas'. All those stimuluses are
> beginning to overload my poor brains.
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
    • From: Kim Crosby <kimcrosby@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: NAmespaces
• Next by Date: Against the Grain: Pascal commentary about XML and databases
• Previous by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread