• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:42:55 -0400

Peter Flynn wrote:
> It would perhaps have been easier if the W3C doc had been called
> "XML Schemas" or "XML Schemata" rather than "XML Schema" --
> after all, we refer to documents about "XML Namespaces", not
> "XML Namespace".
>

Or if the full name "XML Schema Definition Language" had been used in the
title.

-Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
    • From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@K...>
  • RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
    • From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by Date: [ANN] LOGML (Log Markup Language) Draft Specification
• Previous by thread: RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread