Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
They believe what their heros tell them to believe. That is mammalStuff. Every day I have to accept that the guy in the white house knows more than scientists about global warming, that the oil executives understand why gas prices soar when supply is abundant, why in each case, someone chooses my choices. But when it comes to XML, them is us and that is why we come here everyday and *discuss* our options. What we choose becomes the choices those not well-trained to choose here can. After all of that, let me say, I am more often than not very pleased with the results. This is a smart and thoughtful community. It chooses wisely. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Peter Flynn [mailto:peter@s...] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 8:58 AM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: RE: almost four years ago.... At Friday, 15 June 2001, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr. com> wrote: >XML 1.0 is. The family of specs around it >are not. You can teach XML 1.0 in about >half a day. The rest can take three semesters >and then a year of practice. Once out of the >simple instance, XML specs specify a system. >Taken in totality, XML is now much harder >then SGML and throwing the combined specs >onto a floor would kill the first three >rows of the audience. Yes, it's mildly amusing to see people and companies who had previously said they couldn't possibly use SGML because it was "too difficult" now embracing XML even for unsuitable apps because it's new and has an X in it :-) ///Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------ The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
