• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 10:57:24 -0500

Which is probably why a very big and innovative customer 
for XMetal is Microsoft.

Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Champion [mailto:mike.champion@s...]

> So, I think going for a pure XML editor is the only way to go, except of
> course in cases where you produce XML at the complexity degree of XHTML.

I strongly agree. Products such as XMetaL are very easy for end-users to use
once they've been setup with schemas, styleshseets, and some UI
customization
for the specific application.  It's probably easier for a typical XML
developer to learn how to customize XMetaL than it is to setup all the
scripts, styles, templates etc. that a Word add-in would require.

• Prev by Date: RE: MS Word as XML editor?
• Next by Date: James Clark on the cover of Dr. Dobbs
• Previous by thread: RE: MS Word as XML editor?
• Next by thread: RE: MS Word as XML editor?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread