[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
  • To: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:28:58 +0100 (BST)

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Alaric Snell wrote:

> Quoting Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@f...>:
>
> > I understand that not all uses of XML are via HTTP, but isn't there
> > work
> > going on in the HTTP world to add compression?
>
> HTTP has, for a long time, supported bit-transparent compression like deflate
> (aka gzip), just the browsers don't often bother sending the header that says
> "C'mon! You can send it compressed!".

Not true. The majority of the content I deliver from my AxKit based
servers (which transparently supports gzip compression) is compressed.

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Founder and CTO  **  **   http://axkit.com/     **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org  **
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member