[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
After watching the pronunciation of "Linux" become lost before most people knew what it was, I amn't going to be the one to fight against the tide for a particular use of the language, especially when Webster's has many thoughtless omissions that really should be considered proper English. I wonder what our colleagues in Beijing think of this debate anyway? > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:49 PM > To: fotios@a...; xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Newbie > > At 10:32 PM 27/06/01 +0100, Fotios wrote: > >The plural of "schema" *is* "schemata". > > Both that and "schemas" are in wide use among literate > people. We kicked this around a couple years ago and > decided that two-syllables were preferable in > principle to three assuming semantic equivalence. -Tim > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|

Cart



