[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>
  • To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, fotios@a..., xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:22:07 -0700

After watching the pronunciation of "Linux" become lost before most
people knew what it was, I amn't going to be the one to fight against
the tide for a particular use of the language, especially when Webster's
has many thoughtless omissions that really should be considered proper
English.

I wonder what our colleagues in Beijing think of this debate anyway?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: fotios@a...; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE: Newbie
> 
> At 10:32 PM 27/06/01 +0100, Fotios wrote:
> >The plural of "schema" *is* "schemata".
> 
> Both that and "schemas" are in wide use among literate
> people.  We kicked this around a couple years ago and
> decided that two-syllables were preferable in
> principle to three assuming semantic equivalence. -Tim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member