Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell wrote > > >The only definition for the Sun canonical form that I have found is the one > > >packaged with the conformance tests. This is labelled "Draft 1" and does, > > >as you state, indicate that the DTD should appear first. ... > > > > Mine doesn't output PIs from the DTD at all. > > I think that the logical course would be to require that all PIs (before > or within the DTD) be reported in document order. PIs within the > DTD would be either before or after the declarations. Agreed, this makes much more sense. This still leaves the question of whether PIs within the DTD should be included. > Call that a bug in the canonical form definitions. (Did the W3C ever fix their canon > xml stuff so it was usable in such contexts?) Not sure what you mean. The W3C canonicalization algorithm does not allow for a DTD in the canonical form. PIs are output in document order. > > Anything else would seem to drop the requirements of the XML spec > that PIs be reported. If that happens, then the XML spec would > need to be revised (and this isn't a case where that should happen). I don't quiet see your point, but I agree that we don't want to need XML 1.0 to change! Regards Rob Lugt ElCel Technology http://www.elcel.com/
|
