• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• To: Jim Mehl <mehl@i...>
• Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 21:14:59 +0200

the link i posted will lead to bnf's which are not just "closer to what
a parser
generator might expect". they are what that particular parser generator uses.
depends on your parser generator. they might be worth a look before one
starts munging over the xml spec

Jim Mehl wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the responses, but I didn't explain myself very well. I'm
> looking for a form of the syntax that is closer to what a parser
> generator might expect. Sounds like I might have to do what
> Bob DuCharme suggested (pull it out of the XML version of the
> XML spec).
> ...

...

• References:
  • Re: DTD formal syntax
    • From: Jim Mehl <mehl@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD formal syntax
• Next by Date: Schemas Article
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD formal syntax
• Next by thread: Re: DTD formal syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread