• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:00:44 -0400

At 11:36 AM -0500 6/29/01, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Looks legal but the reality is some
>tools attempt to import the schema based
>on the namespace identifier.  When it gets
>that "doc", it will fail because it wants a
>schema, not a human readable description.

Can you provide more details about these unnamed tools? I've never 
seen any such thing.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • RE: About namespaces
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Next by Date: RE: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Previous by thread: RE: About namespaces
• Next by thread: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread