• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Joel Rees <rees@m...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 00:32:46 -0400

Joel Rees wrote:
>
> Is this the right interpretation? You have two schemata, written to
> different standards. You have a set of documents. Your equality comparison
> is to say the two schemata are equal, for the given set of documents, iff
> each schema validates each document in the set with the same result as the
> other schema.

no. schema 'equality' is defined if the entire set of instances is the same
for both schemata, not just a subset. what I said was that a given document
could be tested for inclusion in the instance set of a schema.

-Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
    • From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: what's a good conference this fall?
• Next by Date: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
• Previous by thread: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
• Next by thread: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread