• From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:04:26 +0100

On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: "Murali Mani" <mani@C...>
> 
> > My vote will be for schemata purely based on the above reasons, if I am
> > asked to choose between schemas and schemata. But I am not sure if it is
> > that important.
> 
> W3C XML Schemas is what the recommendation is called, 

But the whole point is that it's not. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema
says:

<title>W3C XML Schema</title> 
[...]
<h1>XML Schema</h1>

///Peter

• References:
  • RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
  • Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Going to the extreme
• Next by Date: RE: [OT] The stigma of schema
• Previous by thread: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Next by thread: RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread